A few days ago, still trying to recover from my short visit to the SHOT Show, I made a quick trip to the range to work with a few guns that I have from manufacturers. The wintry season keeps those trips short, so little gets done.
This was the third range trip for the Ruger Security-9 sample, all those trips done in January. An earlier trip saw me using Ruger ARX +P ammo and Remington Golden Saber 147 grain BJHP. The gun easily handled the +P loads. On another trip, actually “warm” enough to get on paper, I did some handling drills. I found the Pachmayr Tactical Grip Glove, sized for Glock Compacts (e.g., 19, 23, etc.), and available from ShopRuger.com had slipped some. I used a Birchwood Casey “Dirty Bird” 12”x18” BC-27, a downsized version of the NRA B-27 target. There were only a pair of hits outside the 10” x 6” “8-“ ring, which is the maximum 5-point scoring zone on the barn-sized NRA B-27 when used for qualification.
The ammo used for those exercises was Federal “Aluminum” featuring 115 FMJ bullets. It’s also a likely round to be used for casual range activity or qualification.
That was the trip that I rounded out by shooting the dueling tree. By looking over the gun – shooting “out of the notch” – I found that I was hitting the ca. 6” plates from fifteen yards. The index is correct, but I tend to shoot left with the Security-9 on paper as I do with many other guns . . . whether shooting right hand or left.
I’d also fired the Security-9 from a seated rest to try to get an idea of its accuracy. I found that an older load, Hornady 147 grain TAP-FPD, featuring an XTP bullet, gave a four-inch group at 25 yards. Black Hills 115 grain FMJ put five rounds into 2 ¾” from 25 yards.
On the last trip, 13 MPH winds, with periodic gusts, drove the temp into the mid-20s. Fingers were numb, targets blew about and the air was tinted blue with my language. As smarter folks had remained indoors my verbal indiscretions can be left to the imagination – no witnesses.
I’d decided on the Kansas law enforcement qualification, found here, to evaluate the Ruger Security-9 as a possible carry gun. The course is easy to set up, quick to shoot, especially if you run it a lot over time. You can dress it up by turning some of the close stages into “failure drills” and by using a Q-target with scoring rings like the IALEFI-Q.
I used that target. The Ruger Security-9 was loaded with Winchester USA Forged 115-grain FMJ range ammo. I used it because it’s the kind of ammo that people will buy for range training, annual requals and such. And it uses a steel cartridge case, something unusual for non-wartime production in the US. If any ammunition can cause the new gun to choke, low-cost ammo is the most likely.
The holster I used was the Safariland Model 576 GLS Pro-Fit (Compact) Holster. It combines the Grip Locking System with an adjustable holster body made to fit a wide variety of guns with a single holster. The holster fits the Glock 19 without adjustment – even the Gen5. It also fit the S&W M&P9 M.2 Compact and the Ruger Security-9, all without turning the adjustment screw. The holster is fitted with the “high ride” belt loop back featuring slots for an inch-and-a-half belt.
My custom is to start at distance to do the long stage, but I wasn’t playing that game in the cold. After the target was up, I shot the stages in order.
The course includes moving and shooting, three-shot strings, shooting with either hand, shots fired from the draw and from low ready. Ten rounds of the fifty are shot from the furthest distance, 25 yards.
This makes the accuracy equation fairly easy. I confess to shooting failure drills up close. Three hits launched at the face went into the scoring circle. When I’d finished, I had a pair of rounds out on either side of the scoring circle but still in the “bottle” scoring area used by the training commission. They weren’t out far.
Three hits were in the secondary ring, with all the remainder in the “x” ring.
So, a sub-$300 gun with sub-$9 a box ammo from the nearby big box store, exceeded the annual requirements of a law enforcement officer – and shot damn well.
The bad news? A pair of failures to extract, the first issues with this particular gun. There were no stoppages with any load, save the USA Forged. It’s not the only gun that doesn’t like the steel-cased round – but this Security-9 is one of very few in my experience that had trouble with it.
An exhaustive test? No, but I’m getting the idea that the Ruger Security-9 works well with most ammunition, that it can be reasonably accurate with some loads – looks like it’s favoring lighter bullets, but more checking needs to be done – and that it’s a lot of fun to shoot. It fits into the envelope containing the most popular service/compact size centerfire pistol available, comes in at a lower price and it seems to fit a lot of different holsters that are already out there.
If you want a low-cost, high quality 9mm pistol, the Ruger Security-9 deserves your interest.
- - Rich Grassi